Urambazaji
Advertise here

Modeli zilizolinganishwa

Ulinganisho wa benchmark Minimax M3.1 Flash (high) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (high) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (high) vs Claude Opus 5 (high): GPT-5.6 Sol (high) inaongoza kwenye Alama kwa 9.5. Minimax M3.1 Flash (high) inaongoza kwenye Uaminifu kwa 10.0. Minimax M3.1 Flash (high) ina Jumla ya gharama ya chini zaidi kwa $0.000. GPT-5.6 Sol (high) ndiyo ya haraka zaidi kwa 13.59s.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-10-19

Modeli zilizolinganishwa

Nafasi
#228
Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo
279,438
Muda wa majibu (wastani)
34.00s
Jumla ya gharama
$0.000
Nafasi
#126
Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo
911,334
Muda wa majibu (wastani)
58.56s
Jumla ya gharama
$0.589
Nafasi
#22
Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo
32,071
Muda wa majibu (wastani)
13.59s
Jumla ya gharama
$1.595
Nafasi
#27
Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo
105,662
Muda wa majibu (wastani)
25.31s
Jumla ya gharama
$4.524
Muundo unaopendekezwa GPT-5.6 Sol (high)

It has the best score here (9.5), while costing about 1.6x less than miundo mingine katika ulinganisho huu.

Ulinganisho wa kina

Kipimo Minimax M3.1 Flash Minimax M3.1 Flash high Toleo: 2026-10-19 Inapatikana bure DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 high Toleo: 2026-10-18 GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol high Toleo: 2026-07-09 Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 high Toleo: 2026-07-25
Alama 6.5 7.8 9.5 9.4
Nafasi #228 #126 #22 #27
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 7.2 7.8 8.9 10.0
Majaribio 69/69 69/69 69/69 69/69
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 56.5% 71.0% 89.9% 82.6%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 8 6 3 0
Jumla ya uendeshaji 69 69 69 69
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.000 4.530 8.020 23.809
Jumla ya gharama $0.000 $0.589 $1.595 $4.524
Bei ya ingizo $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M $2.000 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.000 / 1M $0.600 / 1M $10.000 / 1M $25.000 / 1M
Bei ya kusoma akiba Haipo $0.003 / 1M $0.200 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Bei ya kuandika akiba Haipo Haipo $2.500 / 1M $6.250 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 357,984 279,873 195,567 376,421
Tokeni za matokeo 70,004 7,049 5,841 67,688
Tokeni za hoja 209,434 904,285 26,230 37,974
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 34.00s 58.56s 13.59s 25.31s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 280.72s 440.77s 59.99s 159.01s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 781.92s 1346.87s 312.61s 582.11s
Vigezo - ~748B jumla (~16B vinavyotumika) ~2T jumla (~150B vinavyotumika) ~5T jumla (~500B vinavyotumika)
Upatikanaji Imefungwa Chanzo huria Imefungwa Imefungwa

Bei za akiba zinahusu tokeni za ingizo. Kusoma hutumia tena maelekezo yaliyohifadhiwa; kuandika huyahifadhi na kunaweza kuongeza gharama. Tokeni za matokeo hutumia bei ya matokeo.

Onyesho la kizazi cha modeli

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#228 Minimax M3.1 Flash

high
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
75.4s
Tokeni
9,436 tok

#126 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

high
Gharama
$0.004
Muda
27.2s
Tokeni
7,593 tok

#22 GPT-5.6 Sol

high
Gharama
$0.151
Muda
201.9s
Tokeni
5,100 tok

#27 Claude Opus 5

high
Gharama
$0.265
Muda
144.5s
Tokeni
10,741 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Minimax M3.1 Flash 5.6 4.7 55.6% 2 36.78s 9,024 60,602 13,024
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 4.5 1.4 66.7% 3 196.67s 7,434 217 446,179
GPT-5.6 Sol 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.52s 7,302 404 5,656
Claude Opus 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.73s 10,590 7,547 1,721

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho