Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Muhtasari

Qwen3.5-Flash inaongoza kwa average score: 6.1 vs 6.0. Qwen3.5-Flash ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.005 vs $0.030. Qwen3.5-Flash ni ya haraka zaidi: 3.58s vs 6.47s, na pass rates 46.0% vs 39.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.5-FlashIt has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 7.2x less than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-14

Kipimo KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low Toleo: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Toleo: 2026-02-24
Alama 6.0 6.1
Nafasi #124 #119
Uaminifu 9.7 10.0
Uthabiti 7.6 9.7
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 46.0% 39.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 6 1
Jumla ya uendeshaji 63 63
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.427 0.075
Jumla ya gharama $0.030 $0.005
Bei ya ingizo $0.150 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.600 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 42,464 46,439
Tokeni za matokeo 4,227 4,276
Tokeni za hoja 34,864 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 6.47s 3.58s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 25.49s 27.18s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 135.80s 75.28s

Onyesho la kizazi

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#124 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

low
Gharama
$0.004
Muda
29.9s
Tokeni
6,008 tok

#119 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Gharama
$0.003
Muda
47.4s
Tokeni
7,799 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.5 7.3 11.1% 1 11.06s 7,893 2,001 13,623
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho