Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

Muhtasari

average score iko karibu sawa: 6.2 vs 6.2. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.064 vs $0.141. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.35s vs 11.02s, na pass rates 46.0% vs 57.1%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high)It has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 2.2x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (low).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-14

Kipimo KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Toleo: 2026-07-14 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Toleo: 2026-07-09
Alama 6.2 6.2
Nafasi #110 #113
Uaminifu 9.7 10.0
Uthabiti 7.6 8.5
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 46.0% 57.1%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 6 4
Jumla ya uendeshaji 63 63
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.910 1.404
Jumla ya gharama $0.064 $0.141
Bei ya ingizo $0.150 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.600 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 41,748 34,218
Tokeni za matokeo 3,894 2,110
Tokeni za hoja 91,773 15,571
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 11.02s 4.35s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 104.98s 18.06s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 231.37s 91.45s

Onyesho la kizazi

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#110 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

#113 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Gharama
$0.011
Muda
10.2s
Tokeni
1,897 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho