Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Ling 3.0 Flash inaongoza kwa average score: 5.7 vs 5.5. Ling 3.0 Flash ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.000 vs $0.164. Ling 3.0 Flash ni ya haraka zaidi: 3.46s vs 6.70s, na pass rates 27.3% vs 40.9%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGLM 5.1It has the best overall balance of score, reliability, cost, and response time in this comparison.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-24

Kipimo Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Toleo: 2026-07-24 Inapatikana bure GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Toleo: 2026-04-07
Alama 5.7 5.5
Nafasi #149 #159
Uaminifu 9.9 10.0
Uthabiti 10.0 8.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 27.3% 40.9%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 0 5
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.000 2.368
Jumla ya gharama $0.000 $0.164
Bei ya ingizo $0.000 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.000 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 124,176 124,209
Tokeni za matokeo 12,783 14,393
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 3.46s 6.70s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 17.51s 61.20s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 76.06s 147.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
11.6s
Tokeni
2,781 tok

#159 GLM 5.1

none
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho