Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Gemma 4 31B (medium) inaongoza kwa average score: 6.3 vs 6.2. Gemma 4 31B (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.116 vs $0.139. Gemma 4 31B (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 75.38s vs 84.82s, na pass rates 68.2% vs 69.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGemma 4 31B (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-25

Kipimo Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Toleo: 2026-04-02 Inapatikana bure Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Toleo: 2026-02-24
Alama 6.3 6.2
Nafasi #121 #125
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 9.0 7.8
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 68.2% 69.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 2 6
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 1.044 1.361
Jumla ya gharama $0.116 $0.139
Bei ya ingizo $0.140 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.400 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 94,992 118,499
Tokeni za matokeo 34,468 12,284
Tokeni za hoja 223,278 490,610
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 75.38s 84.82s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 437.40s 515.38s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 1507.52s 1781.22s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
45.7s
Tokeni
2,696 tok

#125 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
25.8s
Tokeni
4,294 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho