Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Muhtasari

GLM 5.1 inaongoza kwa average score: 5.5 vs 5.0. DeepSeek V3.2 ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.054 vs $0.164. GLM 5.1 ni ya haraka zaidi: 6.70s vs 18.25s, na pass rates 37.9% vs 40.9%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGLM 5.1It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 2.7x faster than DeepSeek V3.2.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-17

Kipimo DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 none Toleo: 2025-12-01 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Toleo: 2026-04-07
Alama 5.0 5.5
Nafasi #165 #144
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 7.7 8.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 37.9% 40.9%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 6 5
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.870 2.368
Jumla ya gharama $0.054 $0.164
Bei ya ingizo $0.269 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.400 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 135,780 124,209
Tokeni za matokeo 42,097 14,393
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 18.25s 6.70s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 115.89s 61.20s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 401.60s 147.38s

Onyesho la kizazi

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#165 DeepSeek V3.2

none
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
7.0s
Tokeni
1,046 tok

#144 GLM 5.1

none
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
DeepSeek V3.2 3.1 6.9 11.1% 1 14.54s 7,279 4,528 0
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho