Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Claude Opus 4.8 inaongoza kwa average score: 7.3 vs 7.2. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.317 vs $1.166. Claude Opus 4.8 ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.91s vs 46.36s, na pass rates 63.6% vs 63.6%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaClaude Opus 4.8It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 9.4x faster than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-20

Kipimo Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Toleo: 2026-05-28 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium Toleo: 2026-04-20
Alama 7.3 7.2
Nafasi #66 #70
Uaminifu 10.0 9.6
Uthabiti 9.2 9.0
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 63.6% 63.6%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 2 2
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 8.969 3.023
Jumla ya gharama $1.166 $0.317
Bei ya ingizo $5.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $25.000 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 149,206 42,097
Tokeni za matokeo 16,797 2,280
Tokeni za hoja 0 166,613
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 4.91s 46.36s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 35.03s 189.38s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 108.03s 973.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#66 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Gharama
$0.053
Muda
22.0s
Tokeni
2,253 tok

#70 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

medium
Gharama
$0.008
Muda
76.7s
Tokeni
4,355 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 6.2 8.7 33.3% 0 125.25s 7,630 308 58,682

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho