Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (low) inaongoza kwa average score: 7.4 vs 7.3. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (low) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.387 vs $1.166. Claude Opus 4.8 ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.91s vs 19.47s, na pass rates 63.6% vs 69.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (low)It has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 3.0x less than Claude Opus 4.8.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-17

Kipimo Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Toleo: 2026-05-28 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 low Toleo: 2026-07-14
Alama 7.3 7.4
Nafasi #63 #59
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 9.2 7.0
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 63.6% 69.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 2 8
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 8.969 3.514
Jumla ya gharama $1.166 $0.387
Bei ya ingizo $5.000 / 1M $0.740 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $25.000 / 1M $2.960 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 149,206 87,673
Tokeni za matokeo 16,797 7,166
Tokeni za hoja 0 101,474
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 4.91s 19.47s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 35.03s 209.15s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 108.03s 428.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#63 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Gharama
$0.053
Muda
22.0s
Tokeni
2,253 tok

#59 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

low
Gharama
$0.016
Muda
47.6s
Tokeni
5,182 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 24.87s 7,893 402 24,945

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho