Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

LongCat 2.0 (medium) inaongoza kwa average score: 7.4 vs 7.3. LongCat 2.0 (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.478 vs $1.166. Claude Opus 4.8 ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.91s vs 136.64s, na pass rates 63.6% vs 60.6%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaClaude Opus 4.8Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while responding about 27.8x faster than LongCat 2.0 (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-20

Kipimo Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Toleo: 2026-05-28 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 medium Toleo: 2026-07-20
Alama 7.3 7.4
Nafasi #66 #60
Uaminifu 10.0 9.8
Uthabiti 9.2 8.9
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 63.6% 60.6%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 2 3
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 8.969 3.978
Jumla ya gharama $1.166 $0.478
Bei ya ingizo $5.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $25.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 149,206 97,315
Tokeni za matokeo 16,797 44,384
Tokeni za hoja 0 329,012
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 4.91s 136.64s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 35.03s 939.52s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 108.03s 3006.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#66 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Gharama
$0.053
Muda
22.0s
Tokeni
2,253 tok

#60 LongCat 2.0

medium
Gharama
$0.016
Muda
285.1s
Tokeni
13,057 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
LongCat 2.0 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 455.00s 7,419 533 214,143

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho