Urambazaji
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Modeli zilizolinganishwa

Ulinganisho wa benchmark Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (high) vs Qwen3.8 27B (high): Claude Opus 5.5 (high) inaongoza kwenye Alama kwa 9.4. Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh) inaongoza kwenye Uaminifu kwa 10.0. Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh) ina Jumla ya gharama ya chini zaidi kwa $0.140. Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh) ndiyo ya haraka zaidi kwa 16.58s.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-10-07

Modeli zilizolinganishwa

Nafasi
#35
Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo
199,268
Muda wa majibu (wastani)
16.58s
Jumla ya gharama
$0.140
Nafasi
#24
Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo
42,782
Muda wa majibu (wastani)
27.55s
Jumla ya gharama
$2.133
Nafasi
#56
Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo
677,080
Muda wa majibu (wastani)
166.34s
Jumla ya gharama
~$0.298
Muundo unaopendekezwa Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)

Its score stays close to the best score here (9.1 vs 9.4), while costing about 8.7x less than miundo mingine katika ulinganisho huu.

Ulinganisho wa kina

Kipimo Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Haiku 5.5 xhigh Toleo: 2026-10-07 Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 high Toleo: 2026-09-23 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B high Toleo: 2026-08-14 Inapatikana bure
Alama 9.1 9.4 8.7
Nafasi #35 #24 #56
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0 9.7
Uthabiti 9.3 9.3 9.2
Majaribio 69/69 69/69 69/69
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 81.2% 87.0% 78.3%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 2 2 2
Jumla ya uendeshaji 69 69 69
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.773 11.222 ~1.751
Jumla ya gharama $0.140 $2.133 ~$0.298
Bei ya ingizo $0.100 / 1M $4.000 / 1M Haipo
Bei ya toleo $0.500 / 1M $20.000 / 1M Haipo
Bei ya kusoma akiba $0.010 / 1M $0.200 / 1M Haipo
Bei ya kuandika akiba $0.125 / 1M $5.000 / 1M Haipo
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 394,509 319,095 348,967
Tokeni za matokeo 10,349 10,371 1,005
Tokeni za hoja 188,919 32,411 676,075
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 16.58s 27.55s 166.34s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 92.74s 95.95s 640.85s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 381.40s 633.73s 3825.81s
Vigezo ~50B ~5T jumla (~500B vinavyotumika) 27.3B
Upatikanaji Imefungwa Imefungwa Uzani unapatikana

Bei za akiba zinahusu tokeni za ingizo. Kusoma hutumia tena maelekezo yaliyohifadhiwa; kuandika huyahifadhi na kunaweza kuongeza gharama. Tokeni za matokeo hutumia bei ya matokeo.

Onyesho la kizazi cha modeli

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#35 Claude Haiku 5.5

xhigh
Gharama
$0.021
Muda
189.0s
Tokeni
41,343 tok

#24 Claude Opus 5.5

high
Gharama
$0.136
Muda
75.6s
Tokeni
6,934 tok

#56 Qwen3.8 27B

high
Gharama
~$0.008
Muda
270.1s
Tokeni
18,963 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Claude Haiku 5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 13.13s 10,608 504 26,396
Claude Opus 5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 13.44s 10,608 584 5,042
Qwen3.8 27B 8.1 7.0 88.9% 1 248.62s 8,235 346 143,335

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho

GPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighInapatikana bureClaude Haiku 5.5xhighvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumQwen3.8 27BhighInapatikana burevsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumClaude Haiku 5.5xhighvsMuse Spark 1.3highSeed 2.1 TurbomediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighInapatikana bureClaude Haiku 5.5xhighvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highGPT-6 SollowvsQwen3.8 27BhighInapatikana bureClaude Haiku 5.5xhighvsParetodefaultClaude Haiku 5.5xhighvsSeed 2.1 TurbohighClaude Opus 5.5highvsGemini 3.7 FlashlowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsQwen3.8 27BhighInapatikana bureClaude Haiku 5.5xhighvsQwen3.8 MAXmedium