Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Apelare instrumente
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Apelare instrumente, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↓.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Apelare instrumente | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #128 | Qwen3.6 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.4 | 1/1 | 2.49s |
| #140 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.9 | 1/1 | 2.47s |
| #143 | MiMo-V2.5 none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 4.9 | 1/1 | 2.43s |
| #144 | GPT-5.4 Mini none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 4.9 | 0/1 | 2.32s |
| #117 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.6 | 1/1 | 2.30s |
| #152 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 4.6 | 1/1 | 2.28s |
| #163 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 10.0 | 4.0 | 1/1 | 2.17s |
| #131 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.3 | 1/1 | 2.04s |
| #146 | Laguna Xs.2 none | Poolside | 3.0 | 4.8 | 0/1 | 1.93s |
| #97 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.2 | 1/1 | 1.91s | |
| #81 | Mercury 2 medium | Inception | 10.0 | 6.6 | 1/1 | 1.89s |
| #142 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 10.0 | 4.9 | 1/1 | 1.40s |
| #154 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.6 | 1/1 | 1.27s |
| #155 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 10.0 | 4.5 | 1/1 | 1.27s |
| #20 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 3.0 | 8.1 | 0/1 | 0ms |