Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Specific domeniului
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Specific domeniului, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Metrică ↑.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Specific domeniului | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #87 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 5.3 | 5.1 | 1/3 | 962ms |
| #92 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 5.3 | 4.7 | 1/3 | 638ms |
| #52 | Grok 4.1 Fast medium | X AI | 5.8 | 6.7 | 1/3 | 121.8s |
| #6 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 5.9 | 8.6 | 1/3 | 88.7s |
| #7 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 5.9 | 8.6 | 1/3 | 64.3s |
| #15 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 5.9 | 8.2 | 1/3 | 37.3s | |
| #38 | GPT-5.4 Nano medium | OpenAI | 5.9 | 7.6 | 1/3 | 38.2s |
| #40 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 5.9 | 7.5 | 1/3 | 77.8s |
| #41 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 5.9 | 7.5 | 1/3 | 96.0s |
| #62 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 5.9 | 6.2 | 1/3 | 495ms | |
| #95 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 5.9 | 4.5 | 1/3 | 1.06s |
| #98 | LFM2-24B-A2B none | Liquid | 5.9 | 4.1 | 1/3 | 287ms |
| #2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 7.7 | 9.6 | 2/3 | 32.7s | |
| #3 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 7.7 | 9.2 | 2/3 | 1.17s |
| #4 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 7.7 | 9.2 | 2/3 | 1.19s |