AI BENCHY Categorie
Instructies opvolgen-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Instructies opvolgen, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↓.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Instructies opvolgen-score
8.5
Beste model
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 10.0| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Instructies opvolgen-score | Score | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.8 | 2/2 | 4.04s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.6 | 2/2 | 3.35s | |
| #3 | Gemini 3.5 Flash low | 9.9 | 9.4 | 2/2 | 1.86s | |
| #4 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.4 | 2/2 | 9.56s | |
| #5 | Qwen3.7 Max medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 9.1 | 2/2 | 7.46s |
| #6 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 9.9 | 9.0 | 2/2 | 3.74s |
| #7 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 9.9 | 9.0 | 2/2 | 2.70s | |
| #8 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.9 | 2/2 | 1.46s |
| #9 | GPT-5.5 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.8 | 2/2 | 3.36s |
| #10 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | 2/2 | 3.32s |
| #11 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #12 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 9.8 | 8.6 | 2/2 | 64.0s | |
| #13 | Grok 4.20 Beta medium | X AI | 9.8 | 8.5 | 2/2 | 4.89s |
| #14 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.5 | 2/2 | 24.3s |
| #15 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 3.04s |