AI BENCHY Categorie
Instructies opvolgen-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Instructies opvolgen, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↓.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Instructies opvolgen-score
8.0
Beste model
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 10.0| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Instructies opvolgen-score | Score | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #17 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | 2/2 | 1.91s | |
| #18 | GLM 5 Turbo medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.1 | 2/2 | 5.38s |
| #19 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.1 | 2/2 | 9.88s |
| #20 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.1 | 2/2 | 7.54s |
| #22 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 10.0 | 8.1 | 2/2 | 1.49s | |
| #23 | MiMo-V2-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 9.9 | 8.1 | 2/2 | 3.36s |
| #24 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2/2 | 17.5s | |
| #26 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2/2 | 2.61s |
| #27 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2/2 | 35.8s |
| #29 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 10.0 | 7.9 | 2/2 | 1.13s | |
| #31 | GLM 5V Turbo medium | Z.ai | 9.9 | 7.8 | 2/2 | 3.74s |
| #32 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | 2/2 | 63.5s |
| #34 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 12.5s |
| #37 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.6 | 2/2 | 2.43s |
| #38 | GPT-5.4 Nano medium | OpenAI | 9.8 | 7.6 | 2/2 | 1.88s |