AI BENCHY Categorie
Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↓.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
9.0
Beste model
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 10.0| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 10.0 | 2/2 | 4.72s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.6 | 2/2 | 7.72s | |
| #3 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #4 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | 2/2 | 2.15s |
| #5 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview low | 10.0 | 8.8 | 2/2 | 9.40s | |
| #6 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.6 | 2/2 | 9.07s |
| #7 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.6 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #8 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.5 | 2/2 | 46.9s |
| #9 | Qwen3.6 Plus Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.5 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #10 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 30.3s |
| #11 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 7.16s | |
| #12 | Gemini 3 PRO Preview medium | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 10.8s | |
| #14 | Gemma 4 31B medium | 10.0 | 8.3 | 2/2 | 21.1s | |
| #15 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | 2/2 | 4.06s | |
| #16 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.2 | 2/2 | 5.32s |