AI BENCHY Categorie
Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↓.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
8.7
Beste model
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 10.0| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.8 | 2/2 | 5.43s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.6 | 2/2 | 6.43s | |
| #3 | Gemini 3.5 Flash low | 10.0 | 9.4 | 2/2 | 1.81s | |
| #4 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.4 | 2/2 | 7.72s | |
| #5 | Qwen3.7 Max medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 9.1 | 2/2 | 8.80s |
| #6 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.0 | 2/2 | 3.28s |
| #7 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 9.0 | 2/2 | 4.07s | |
| #8 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.9 | 2/2 | 2.15s |
| #9 | GPT-5.5 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.8 | 2/2 | 4.18s |
| #11 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #12 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 10.0 | 8.6 | 2/2 | 7.16s | |
| #13 | Grok 4.20 Beta medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.5 | 2/2 | 4.01s |
| #14 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.5 | 2/2 | 41.2s |
| #15 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #16 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview low | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 9.40s |