Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↓.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
Gemini 3.6 Flash 1.0
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #128 | GLM 5.3 high | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.495 | 2/2 | 3.55s |
| #129 | Step 3.7 Flash medium | Stepfun | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.571 | 2/2 | 2.75s |
| #130 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.270 | 2/2 | 11.5s |
| #131 | Qwen3.7 Plus none | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.178 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #132 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.345 | 2/2 | 3.44s |
| #133 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 medium | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.460 | 2/2 | 5.21s |
| #134 | Muse Wonder high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.426 | 2/2 | 7.09s |
| #135 | GPT-6 Luna high | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.074 | 2/2 | 24.5s |
| #137 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL medium | NVIDIA | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.437 | 2/2 | 6.69s |
| #138 | Claude Haiku 5.5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.063 | 2/2 | 3.43s |
| #139 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.435 | 2/2 | 38.3s |
| #140 | Qwen3.7 Flash low | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.071 | 2/2 | 15.4s |
| #142 | Muse Wonder xhigh | Meta | 1.0 | 0.8 | $4.012 | 2/2 | 6.90s |
| #143 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | ~$0.047 | 2/2 | 6.65s |
| #144 | GPT-6 Luna low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.033 | 2/2 | 9.94s |