Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↓.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
Gemini 3.6 Flash 1.0
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #31 | Claude Opus 5.5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.804 | 2/2 | 12.7s |
| #32 | Muse Wonder medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.397 | 2/2 | 6.12s |
| #33 | GPT-5.5 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $4.809 | 2/2 | 4.18s |
| #34 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 max | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $8.557 | 2/2 | 16.1s |
| #35 | Qwen3.8 MAX medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.181 | 2/2 | 8.72s |
| #36 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 low | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.355 | 2/2 | 1.71s |
| #37 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.306 | 2/2 | 16.4s |
| #38 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.318 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #39 | Claude Haiku 5.5 xhigh | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.140 | 2/2 | 3.65s |
| #40 | Muse Spark 1.3 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.891 | 2/2 | 7.01s |
| #41 | Muse Wonder low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.637 | 2/2 | 4.27s |
| #42 | Pareto default | Unbiased | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.520 | 2/2 | 2.57s |
| #43 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.892 | 2/2 | 33.7s |
| #44 | Muse Wonder minimal | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.639 | 2/2 | 3.31s |
| #45 | Muse Spark Open xhigh | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.081 | 2/2 | 16.4s |