Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Responstijd (gem.) ↓.
216/216
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #88 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 6.9 | $0.187 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #146 | Nemotron 3 Super medium | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.055 | 2/2 | 18.2s |
| #194 | Cobuddy medium | Baidu | 6.3 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 17.4s |
| #115 | Mimo V2 PRO medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 6.3 | $0.333 | 1/2 | 17.2s |
| #37 | Kimi K3 max | Moonshot AI | 7.3 | 8.0 | $3.112 | 1/2 | 16.7s |
| #100 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.089 | 2/2 | 16.5s | |
| #136 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.108 | 2/2 | 15.0s |
| #41 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.405 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #181 | Qwen3.6 Plus Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.9 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #51 | MiniMax M3 medium | Minimax | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.286 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #90 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.9 | $1.207 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #44 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.8 | $2.057 | 2/2 | 13.9s |
| #42 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.187 | 2/2 | 13.4s |
| #94 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.7 | $0.746 | 2/2 | 13.0s |
| #29 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.237 | 2/2 | 12.6s |