AI BENCHY
Vergelijken Grafieken Methodologie
โค๏ธ Made by XCS
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get ๐Ÿ“Šstats, ๐Ÿ”ฅheatmaps and ๐Ÿ‘€recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Categorie

Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst

Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Responstijd (gem.) โ†‘.

Getoonde modellen

55

Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score

8.8

Rang Model Bedrijf Gegevensparsering en extractie-score Gem. score Correcte tests Responstijd (gem.)
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 5.5 7.2 1/2 0ms
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 9.9 5.2 2/2 652ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 5.5 3.4 1/2 667ms
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 10.0 2.6 0/2 714ms
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 9.9 2.9 2/2 943ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 9.9 5.0 2/2 1.01s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 9.9 4.5 2/2 1.04s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 5.5 5.3 1/2 1.11s
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 9.9 4.7 2/2 1.16s
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 9.9 7.1 2/2 1.22s
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 9.9 4.0 2/2 1.27s
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 5.4 4.0 1/2 1.32s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 9.9 7.2 2/2 1.41s
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 9.9 4.9 2/2 1.43s
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 5.0 3.1 1/2 1.51s
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 9.9 5.2 2/2 1.57s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 9.9 6.2 2/2 1.89s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 5.5 5.1 1/2 1.98s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 9.9 7.3 2/2 2.21s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 9.9 7.5 2/2 2.29s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 9.9 7.3 2/2 3.00s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 9.9 7.4 2/2 3.05s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 9.9 8.4 2/2 3.07s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 9.9 6.5 2/2 3.15s
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 9.9 4.2 2/2 3.26s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 9.9 6.8 2/2 3.43s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 9.9 7.4 2/2 4.06s
#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Google 9.9 10.0 2/2 4.72s
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 5.4 3.9 1/2 4.82s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 9.9 8.0 2/2 5.32s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 9.9 6.0 2/2 5.78s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 9.9 6.2 2/2 6.63s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 9.9 8.2 2/2 7.16s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 9.9 6.6 2/2 7.37s
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 10.0 4.7 0/2 7.48s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 9.9 9.4 2/2 7.72s
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 5.0 7.4 1/2 8.90s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 9.9 8.2 2/2 9.40s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 5.4 5.5 1/2 9.42s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 9.9 8.2 2/2 10.8s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 9.9 6.0 2/2 12.6s
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 9.9 7.7 2/2 13.9s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 10.0 7.4 2/2 15.0s
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 10.0 2.9 0/2 19.7s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 10.0 5.5 0/2 21.4s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 9.9 7.7 2/2 23.4s
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 9.9 6.9 2/2 24.3s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 9.9 8.2 2/2 30.3s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 9.9 7.3 2/2 36.1s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 5.4 4.1 1/2 42.1s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 9.9 8.3 2/2 46.9s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 9.9 6.4 2/2 49.8s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 5.5 6.9 1/2 57.0s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 5.5 5.5 1/2 59.3s
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 5.4 3.5 1/2 81.8s

Topmodellen op Gegevensparsering en extractie-score

Gegevensparsering en extractie-score vs totale kosten

Topmodellen op Responstijd (gem.)