Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Metriek ↑.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
8.9
Beste model
Step 3.5 Flash 1.5
216/216
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #19 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.357 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #20 | Claude Fable 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.6 | $3.478 | 2/2 | 7.18s |
| #21 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $1.533 | 2/2 | 5.32s |
| #22 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.143 | 2/2 | 41.2s |
| #23 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.935 | 2/2 | 3.44s |
| #24 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.951 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #25 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.3 | $1.928 | 2/2 | 6.29s |
| #26 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.922 | 2/2 | 3.16s |
| #27 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.647 | 2/2 | 3.22s |
| #28 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.643 | 2/2 | 4.06s | |
| #29 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.237 | 2/2 | 12.6s |
| #30 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.1 | $1.694 | 2/2 | 8.40s |
| #31 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.584 | 2/2 | 2.71s | |
| #32 | Inkling high | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.006 | 2/2 | 8.19s |
| #33 | Step 3.7 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.515 | 2/2 | 2.75s |