Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Totale kosten ↑.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
Ling 3.1 Flash 1.0
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #122 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.949 | 2/2 | 13.7s |
| #261 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $2.961 | 2/2 | 7.37s |
| #127 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.996 | 2/2 | 6.29s |
| #212 | Grok 4.7 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $3.037 | 2/2 | 8.65s |
| #162 | Claude Fable 5.1 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $3.197 | 2/2 | 4.47s |
| #214 | Ember-1 max | Fireworks | 0.6 | 0.7 | $3.264 | 1/2 | 39.8s |
| #37 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.306 | 2/2 | 16.4s |
| #272 | Claude Fable 5.1 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $3.395 | 2/2 | 4.71s |
| #32 | Muse Wonder medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.397 | 2/2 | 6.12s |
| #208 | Grok 4.7 xhigh | X AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $3.398 | 2/2 | 7.50s |
| #94 | Kimi K3 max | Moonshot AI | 0.7 | 0.8 | $3.409 | 1/2 | 16.7s |
| #134 | Muse Wonder high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.426 | 2/2 | 7.09s |
| #118 | Claude Fable 5.1 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.471 | 2/2 | 6.30s |
| #96 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 0.7 | 0.8 | $3.490 | 1/2 | 12.3s |
| #107 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.636 | 2/2 | 2.37s |