Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Totale kosten ↑.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
Ling 3.1 Flash 1.0
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #62 | Muse Spark Open medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.260 | 2/2 | 10.7s |
| #154 | Seed-2.0-Code medium | Bytedance Seed | 0.7 | 0.7 | $1.275 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #121 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.316 | 2/2 | 4.07s | |
| #38 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.318 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #132 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.345 | 2/2 | 3.44s |
| #6 | GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $1.377 | 2/2 | 2.88s |
| #149 | Mistral Large 4 high | Mistral | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.391 | 2/2 | 35.0s |
| #209 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.419 | 2/2 | 10.7s |
| #79 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.438 | 2/2 | 3.16s |
| #150 | Seed-2.0-Code high | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.448 | 2/2 | 24.3s |
| #224 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.478 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #188 | Ember-1 low | Fireworks | 0.7 | 0.7 | $1.488 | 1/2 | 34.8s |
| #73 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.516 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #42 | Pareto default | Unbiased | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.520 | 2/2 | 2.57s |
| #147 | GLM 5.1 medium | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.546 | 2/2 | 9.33s |