Programmeren-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Programmeren, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↑.
404/404
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Programmeren-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #13 | GPT-5.6 Sol low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $1.244 | 3/3 | 11.3s |
| #14 | GPT-6 Astra low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $2.160 | 3/3 | 3.97s |
| #16 | GPT-6.1 Sol low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $0.460 | 3/3 | 4.48s |
| #19 | GPT-5.6 Sol medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.700 | 3/3 | 9.40s |
| #20 | GPT-6 Astra medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.707 | 3/3 | 4.95s |
| #21 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.595 | 3/3 | 12.5s |
| #22 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.822 | 3/3 | 15.0s |
| #23 | Claude Opus 5.5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.733 | 3/3 | 12.2s |
| #24 | Claude Opus 5.5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.133 | 3/3 | 13.4s |
| #26 | Claude Opus 5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $4.524 | 3/3 | 12.7s |
| #27 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.870 | 3/3 | 9.56s |
| #28 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.645 | 3/3 | 360.8s |
| #31 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 max | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $8.557 | 3/3 | 55.3s |
| #32 | Qwen3.8 MAX medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.181 | 3/3 | 41.3s |
| #33 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.306 | 3/3 | 253.2s |