Programmeren-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Programmeren, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↑.
289/289
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Programmeren-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #34 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 8.8 | 8.6 | $1.132 | 2/3 | 146.5s |
| #35 | Qwen3.8 Max low | Qwen | 8.4 | 8.6 | $0.702 | 2/3 | 28.7s |
| #36 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 8.8 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 2/3 | 44.4s |
| #37 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 7.6 | 8.5 | $2.042 | 2/3 | 155.7s |
| #38 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 8.4 | 8.4 | $0.655 | 2/3 | 10.1s |
| #39 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 8.2 | 8.4 | $1.713 | 2/3 | 120.0s |
| #42 | Qwen3.8 27B high | Qwen | 8.1 | 8.4 | ~$0.287 | 2/3 | 248.6s |
| #43 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 8.2 | 8.4 | $1.951 | 2/3 | 354.9s |
| #46 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 7.8 | 8.2 | $0.644 | 2/3 | 41.0s | |
| #47 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 9.0 | 8.2 | $0.922 | 2/3 | 17.3s |
| #48 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low | Qwen | 7.8 | 8.1 | $2.672 | 2/3 | 172.5s |
| #51 | Inkling high | Thinkingmachines | 8.5 | 8.0 | $1.041 | 2/3 | 148.4s |
| #56 | Inkling medium | Thinkingmachines | 8.4 | 8.0 | $0.377 | 2/3 | 25.2s |
| #57 | GPT-5.6 Terra high | OpenAI | 7.6 | 8.0 | $0.836 | 2/3 | 9.14s |
| #59 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 8.8 | 7.9 | $0.594 | 2/3 | 9.82s |