AI BENCHY Categorie
Programmeren-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Programmeren, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Totale kosten ↑.
188/188
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Programmeren-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #6 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $0.821 | 3/3 | 12.5s |
| #29 | GPT-5.6 Terra high | OpenAI | 7.6 | 8.2 | $0.852 | 2/3 | 9.14s |
| #43 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 5.7 | 7.8 | $0.888 | 1/3 | 214.4s |
| #7 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $0.907 | 3/3 | 15.0s |
| #50 | GPT-5.6 Luna high | OpenAI | 5.5 | 7.7 | $0.924 | 1/3 | 15.6s |
| #53 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 5.7 | 7.6 | $0.927 | 1/3 | 108.5s |
| #14 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 8.8 | 8.9 | $0.960 | 2/3 | 146.5s |
| #5 | GPT-5.6 Sol medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $0.966 | 3/3 | 9.40s |
| #10 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 7.9 | 9.2 | $1.054 | 2/3 | 40.2s | |
| #79 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 8.8 | 7.0 | $1.079 | 2/3 | 34.7s | |
| #15 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.8 | $1.107 | 3/3 | 15.3s |
| #1 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.8 | $1.115 | 3/3 | 23.0s | |
| #75 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 4.0 | 7.1 | $1.148 | 0/3 | 206.2s |
| #20 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 8.8 | 8.5 | $1.210 | 2/3 | 44.4s |
| #45 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 6.6 | 7.7 | $1.270 | 1/3 | 7.58s |