#205 GLM 5V Turbo
none- Cost
- $0.042
- Time
- 177.3s
- Tokens
- 10,434 tok
Z.ai
Release: 2026-04-01
Tested on: 2026-06-04 13:05
z-ai/glm-5v-turbo::none
~106B total (~12B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
GLM 5V Turbo scores 5.6 on AI BENCHY and ranks #205. It has 10.0 reliability, a 36.4% pass rate, $0.052 total cost, and 2.99s average response time.
What makes GLM 5V Turbo unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #2, while Combined is its weakest area at #11. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Archived model: this model is no longer updated or tested on new tests.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~106B total (~12B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Vendor does not disclose the count.
5.6
Consistency
9.5
10.0
$0.052
Total Output Tokens
1,766
Total Input Tokens
37,100
Input Price
$1.200 / 1M
Output Price
$4.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
0
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:05 Re-test | 5.6 | 10.0 | $0.052 | Current run | |
| 2026-06-04 13:05 Re-test | 5.6 | 10.0 | $0.052 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:05 New test added | 5.8 | 10.0 | $0.052 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:41 Suite changed | 5.9 | 10.0 | $0.049 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run | 6.2 | N/A | $0.044 | Compare |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:05 · Current run | 63/66 attempts | 5.6 | 9.5 | 10.0 | 8/21 | 0 | 1,766 | 37,100 | $0.052 | 2.99s |
| 2026-05-21 23:41 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 5.9 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 8/20 | 0 | 1,757 | 0 | $0.049 | 3.02s |
| Difference | — | -0.3 | -0.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | +9 | +37100 | +$0.004 | -30ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $1.200 / 1M | $4.000 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 4.8 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 1.5 | 5.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.6 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |