AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#66

Qwen3.8 MAX

Qwen Release: 2026-08-04 Tested on: 2026-10-01 00:46 qwen/qwen3.8-max::low
2.4T total (~100B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium) (low)

Summary

Qwen3.8 MAX scores 8.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #66. It has 10.0 reliability, a 81.2% pass rate, $1.089 total cost, and 25.09s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.8 MAX unique: It stands out most in Puzzle Solving, where it ranks #2, while Domain specific is its weakest area at #16.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Estimated
Parameters
2.4T total (~100B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Closed
License
-

Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Total is reported for the family; active count is estimated.

Parameter source Availability source

Score

8.8

Consistency

9.0

Reliability

10.0

Total Cost (Current Price)

$1.089 ↑ +26.8%

Tested at: $0.859

Total Output Tokens

93,936

Total Input Tokens

262,495

Input Price

$2.000 / 1M

Output Price

$6.000 / 1M

Cache Read Price

N/A

Cache Write Price

N/A

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 6

Attempt pass rate: 81.2%

Flaky tests

3

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

25.09s

Response Time (max): 155.75s

Response Time (total): 577.14s

Wrong answer: 5 Did not follow instructions: 1

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#66 Qwen3.8 MAX

low
Cost
$0.026
Time
68.5s
Tokens
4,280 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-10-01 00:46 Re-test 8.8 10.0 $1.089 ↑ Current run
2026-08-04 13:01 Initial run 8.7 10.0 $0.687 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-10-01 00:46 · Current run69/69 attempts8.89.010.017/23393,936262,495$1.08925.09s
2026-08-04 13:01 · Initial run66/66 attempts8.79.010.017/22381,41199,172$0.68721.19s
Difference—+0.10.00.000+12525+163323+$0.402+3905ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 69/69 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price Cache Read Price Cache Write Price
2026-08-14 12:51 $2.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M N/A N/A

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Qwen3.8 MAXlowvsKimi K3.1 ProlowQwen3.8 MAXlowvsGPT-5.4mediumQwen3.8 MAXlowvsPareto 26.9defaultQwen3.8 MAXlowvsMuse Spark OpenmediumQwen3.8 MAXlowvsClaude Fable 5mediumQwen3.8 MAXlowvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighQwen3.8 MAXlowvsMuse Spark 1.1mediumQwen3.8 MAXlowvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmediumQwen3.8 MAXlowvsMuse Spark 1.2mediumQwen3.8 MAXlowvsKimi K3.1 Promax

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Agentic 10.0 10.0
Anti-AI Tricks 10.0 10.0
Coding 8.4 7.4
Combined 10.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 2.9 7.2
General Intelligence 6.5 3.4
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 9.9 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models