Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kimi K3.1 Pro (low) vs Qwen3.8 MAX (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.8 vs 8.8. Qwen3.8 MAX (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.089 vs $1.836. Qwen3.8 MAX (low) is faster at 25.09s vs 47.50s, with pass rates of 81.2% vs 81.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-24

Compared models

Rank
#60
Total Output Tokens
139,158
Response Time (avg)
47.50s
Total Cost
$1.836
Rank
#61
Total Output Tokens
93,936
Response Time (avg)
25.09s
Total Cost
$1.089
Recommended model Qwen3.8 MAX (low)

It has the best score here (8.8), while costing about 1.7x less than Kimi K3.1 Pro (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K3.1 Pro Kimi K3.1 Pro low Release: 2026-10-24 Qwen3.8 MAX Qwen3.8 MAX low Release: 2026-08-04
Score 8.8 8.8
Rank #60 #61
Reliability 8.4 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 81.2% 81.2%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 10.796 5.051
Total Cost $1.836 $1.089
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.200 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 221,802 262,495
Output Tokens 12,498 7,787
Reasoning Tokens 126,660 86,149
Response Time (avg) 47.50s 25.09s
Response Time (max) 506.95s 155.75s
Response Time (total) 1092.61s 577.14s
Parameters ~2.8T total (~104B active) 2.4T total (~100B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#60 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro

low
fetch failed
Cost
$0.000
Time
10.7s
Tokens
0 tok

#61 Qwen3.8 MAX

low
Cost
$0.026
Time
68.5s
Tokens
4,280 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K3.1 Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 18.91s 8,070 468 7,531
Qwen3.8 MAX 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 28.69s 8,127 512 15,952

Switch Comparison Pair