Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kimi K3.1 Pro (low) vs Pareto 26.9 (default)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.8 vs 8.9. Kimi K3.1 Pro (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.836 vs $1.864. Pareto 26.9 (default) is faster at 28.26s vs 47.50s, with pass rates of 81.2% vs 79.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-24

Compared models

Rank
#60
Total Output Tokens
139,158
Response Time (avg)
47.50s
Total Cost
$1.836
Rank
#59
Total Output Tokens
175,696
Response Time (avg)
28.26s
Total Cost
$1.864
Recommended model Pareto 26.9 (default)

It has the best score here (8.9), while responding about 1.7x faster than Kimi K3.1 Pro (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K3.1 Pro Kimi K3.1 Pro low Release: 2026-10-24 Pareto 26.9 Pareto 26.9 default Release: 2026-10-15
Score 8.8 8.9
Rank #60 #59
Reliability 8.4 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.1
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 81.2% 79.7%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 10.796 12.422
Total Cost $1.836 $1.864
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $7.500 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.200 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 221,802 218,199
Output Tokens 12,498 175,696
Reasoning Tokens 126,660 0
Response Time (avg) 47.50s 28.26s
Response Time (max) 506.95s 151.76s
Response Time (total) 1092.61s 649.90s
Parameters ~2.8T total (~104B active) -
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#60 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro

low
fetch failed
Cost
$0.000
Time
10.7s
Tokens
0 tok

#59 Pareto 26.9

default
Cost
$0.038
Time
109.6s
Tokens
5,118 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K3.1 Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 18.91s 8,070 468 7,531
Pareto 26.9 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 49.15s 7,419 1,895 0

Switch Comparison Pair