Navigate
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (high) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro (low)

Kimi K3.1 Pro (low) leads on average score with 8.8 vs 8.7. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.617 vs $1.836. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (high) is faster at 33.27s vs 47.50s, with pass rates of 75.4% vs 81.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-24

Compared models

Rank
#64
Total Output Tokens
464,156
Response Time (avg)
33.27s
Total Cost
$0.617
Rank
#60
Total Output Tokens
139,158
Response Time (avg)
47.50s
Total Cost
$1.836
Recommended model DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.7 vs 8.8), while costing about 3.0x less than Kimi K3.1 Pro (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek V4.1 Flash high Release: 2026-09-10 Kimi K3.1 Pro Kimi K3.1 Pro low Release: 2026-10-24
Score 8.7 8.8
Rank #64 #60
Reliability 9.7 8.4
Consistency 9.0 8.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 75.4% 81.2%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.843 10.796
Total Cost $0.617 $1.836
Input Price $0.013 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.320 / 1M $10.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.013 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 282,490 221,802
Output Tokens 8,621 12,498
Reasoning Tokens 455,535 126,660
Response Time (avg) 33.27s 47.50s
Response Time (max) 205.53s 506.95s
Response Time (total) 765.12s 1092.61s
Parameters 748B total (16B active) ~2.8T total (~104B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#64 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

high
Cost
$0.035
Time
111.0s
Tokens
29,201 tok

#60 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro

low
fetch failed
Cost
$0.000
Time
10.7s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 49.19s 7,509 376 108,285
Kimi K3.1 Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 18.91s 8,070 468 7,531

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsMuse Spark OpenmediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsKimi K3.1 PromaxDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsMuse Spark 1.2lowKimi K3.1 ProlowvsGPT-5.4mediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsGPT-5.4mediumKimi K3.1 ProlowvsPareto 26.9defaultClaude Fable 5mediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowMuse Spark 1.1mediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowMuse Spark 1.2mediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsGPT-5.2mediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsQwen3.8 MAXlowMuse Spark OpenmediumvsKimi K3.1 Prolow