AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#104

Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen Release: 2026-04-20 Tested on: 2026-05-21 23:48 qwen/qwen3.6-27b::none
(medium) (none)

Summary

Qwen3.6 27B scores 5.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #104. It has 10.0 reliability, a 50.0% pass rate, $0.032 total cost, and 3.87s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.6 27B unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while Instructions following is its weakest area at #13.

Score

5.8

Consistency

7.5

Total Output Tokens

3,812

Total Input Tokens

0

Input Price

$0.317 / 1M

Output Price

$3.200 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 13

Attempt pass rate: 50.0%

Flaky tests

6

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

3.87s

Response Time (max): 12.08s

Response Time (total): 77.36s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-06-04 13:16 New test added 5.6 10.0 $0.028 Compare
2026-05-21 23:48 Suite changed 5.8 10.0 $0.032 Current run
2026-04-27 21:46 New test added 6.0 10.0 $0.031 Compare
2026-04-27 21:31 First recorded run 5.9 10.0 $0.027 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 3.8 3.7
Coding 6.8 10.0
Combined 3.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 7.3 5.8
Domain specific 7.7 10.0
General Intelligence 5.2 9.9
Instructions following 6.2 5.8
Puzzle Solving 5.3 7.2
Tool Calling 9.5 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models