#55 Qwen3.6 27B
medium- Cost
- $0.009
- Time
- 39.6s
- Tokens
- 3,090 tok
Qwen
Release: 2026-04-20
Tested on: 2026-04-27 21:48
qwen/qwen3.6-27b::medium
27BDenseOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Qwen3.6 27B scores 7.0 on AI BENCHY and ranks #55. It has 10.0 reliability, a 64.8% pass rate, $0.209 total cost, and 50.53s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.6 27B unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 27B
- Architecture
- Dense
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
7.0
Consistency
7.9
10.0
$0.209
Total Output Tokens
99,362
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.500 / 1M
Output Price
$2.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
5
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:41 Re-test | 6.5 | 10.0 | $1.045 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 22:13 New test added | 6.5 | 10.0 | $0.779 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:21 New test added | 6.8 | 10.0 | $0.444 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:59 Suite changed | 6.6 | 9.9 | $0.272 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-27 21:48 New test added | 7.0 | 10.0 | $0.209 | Current run | |
| 2026-04-27 21:31 First recorded run | 7.9 | 10.0 | $0.043 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-27 21:48 · New test added | 54/54 attempts | 7.0 | 7.9 | 10.0 | 9/18 | 5 | 99,362 | 0 | $0.209 | 50.53s |
| 2026-08-14 01:41 · Re-test | 66/66 attempts | 6.5 | 7.6 | 10.0 | 10/22 | 7 | 272,573 | 106,176 | $1.045 | 106.06s |
| Difference | — | +0.5 | +0.3 | 0.0 | -1 | -2 | -173211 | -106176 | -$0.837 | -55535ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3.6 27BmediumvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneQwen3.6 27BmediumvsLaguna XS 2.1mediumFree AvailableQwen3.6 27BmediumvsMercury 2.5 PreviewhighQwen3.6 27BmediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnoneQwen3.6 27BmediumvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumQwen3.6 27BmediumvsQwen3.6 Max PreviewnoneQwen3.6 27BmediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowQwen3.6 27BmediumvsDots 3 Note PreviewlowFree AvailableQwen3.6 27BmediumvsInkling SmallmediumQwen3.6 27BmediumvsDots 3 Note PreviewhighFree Available
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.3 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 7.0 | 3.7 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 3.5 | 1.4 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 6.5 | 3.4 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |