#88 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
none- Cost
- $0.012
- Time
- 153.2s
- Tokens
- 7,787 tok
Qwen
Release: 2026-02-15
Tested on: 2026-05-21 23:45
qwen/qwen3.5-plus-02-15::none
~397B total (~17B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 scores 6.4 on AI BENCHY and ranks #88. It has 10.0 reliability, a 48.3% pass rate, $0.018 total cost, and 2.41s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #4, while Anti-AI Tricks is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~397B total (~17B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the released 397B/A17B family architecture.
6.4
Consistency
9.3
10.0
$0.018
Total Output Tokens
2,496
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.260 / 1M
Output Price
$1.560 / 1M
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:39 Re-test | 6.6 | 10.0 | $0.073 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 21:22 New test added | 6.4 | 10.0 | $0.073 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:10 New test added | 6.3 | 10.0 | $0.016 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:45 Suite changed | 6.4 | 10.0 | $0.018 | Current run | |
| 2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run | 6.8 | N/A | $0.017 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-21 23:45 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 6.4 | 9.3 | 10.0 | 9/20 | 2 | 2,496 | 0 | $0.018 | 2.41s |
| 2026-08-14 01:39 · Re-test | 66/66 attempts | 6.6 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 11/22 | 2 | 29,370 | 102,655 | $0.073 | 9.86s |
| Difference | — | -0.2 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -2 | 0 | -26874 | -102655 | -$0.055 | -7447ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsQwen3.6 27BmediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsLaguna XS 2.1mediumFree AvailableQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsInkling SmallmediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnoneQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsQwen3.6 Max PreviewnoneQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsQwen3.5-27BnoneQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsDots 3 Note PreviewlowFree Available
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 4.8 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 4.9 | 6.9 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.4 | 3.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |