AI BENCHY
Advertise here
#56

Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen Release: 2026-02-24 Tested on: 2026-05-21 23:57 qwen/qwen3.5-flash-02-23::medium
(medium) (none)

Summary

Qwen3.5-Flash scores 7.4 on AI BENCHY and ranks #56. It has 8.3 reliability, a 73.3% pass rate, $0.104 total cost, and 65.64s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.5-Flash unique: It stands out most in Anti-AI Tricks, where it ranks #1, while Coding is its weakest area at #17. It uses unusually many reasoning tokens, which can help explain its slower or more expensive runs.

Score

7.4

Consistency

7.6

Total Output Tokens

286,029

Total Input Tokens

0

Input Price

$0.065 / 1M

Output Price

$0.260 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 9

Attempt pass rate: 73.3%

Flaky tests

6

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

65.64s

Response Time (max): 234.29s

Response Time (total): 1312.72s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#56 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-06-04 13:36 New test added 7.4 8.9 $0.080 Compare
2026-05-21 23:57 Suite changed 7.4 8.3 $0.104 Current run
2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run 7.8 N/A $0.080 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 10.0 10.0
Coding 4.1 5.8
Combined 10.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 7.3 5.9
Domain specific 5.3 7.2
General Intelligence 6.1 3.1
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 6.6 4.6
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models