#48 Qwen3.5-Flash
medium- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 25.8s
- Tokens
- 4,294 tok
Qwen
Release: 2026-02-24
Tested on: 2026-06-04 13:36
qwen/qwen3.5-flash-02-23::medium
~35B total (~3B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Qwen3.5-Flash scores 7.4 on AI BENCHY and ranks #48. It has 8.9 reliability, a 71.4% pass rate, $0.080 total cost, and 63.29s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.5-Flash unique: It stands out most in Instructions following, where it ranks #1, while Coding is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~35B total (~3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the nearest released Qwen3.5 Flash-class checkpoint.
7.4
Consistency
8.1
8.9
Total Output Tokens
296,686
Total Input Tokens
38,926
Input Price
$0.065 / 1M
Output Price
$0.260 / 1M
Flaky tests
5
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:52 Re-test | 6.1 | 10.0 | $0.142 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 22:15 New test added | 6.2 | 10.0 | $0.139 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:36 New test added | 7.4 | 8.9 | $0.080 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-05-21 23:57 Suite changed | 7.4 | 8.3 | $0.104 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 7.8 | N/A | $0.080 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:36 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 7.4 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 12/21 | 5 | 296,686 | 38,926 | $0.080 | 63.29s |
| 2026-08-14 01:52 · Re-test | 66/66 attempts | 6.1 | 7.8 | 10.0 | 11/22 | 6 | 512,846 | 118,508 | $0.142 | 84.44s |
| Difference | — | +1.3 | +0.3 | -1.1 | +1 | -1 | -216160 | -79582 | -$0.062 | -21146ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 14:42 | $0.065 / 1M | $0.260 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3.5-FlashmediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitenoneQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsInklinglowQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsTrinity Large ThinkingmediumQwen3.5-Flashmediumvsgpt-oss-120bmediumQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20none
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 3.7 | 7.2 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.3 | 5.9 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 6.1 | 3.1 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 8.2 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |