#122 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
medium- Cost
- $0.030
- Time
- 58.6s
- Tokens
- 8,683 tok
Moonshot AI
Release: 2026-01-27
Tested on: 2026-08-14 02:00
moonshotai/kimi-k2.5::medium
1T total (32B active)MoEWeights available
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Kimi K2.5 scores 7.0 on AI BENCHY and ranks #122. It has 10.0 reliability, a 63.6% pass rate, $0.607 total cost, and 98.19s average response time.
What makes Kimi K2.5 unique: It stands out most in General Intelligence, where it ranks #4, while Puzzle Solving is its weakest area at #16.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 1T total (32B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Weights available
- License
- Modified MIT
7.0
Consistency
7.0
10.0
Total Output Tokens
220,942
Total Input Tokens
118,496
Input Price
$0.571 / 1M
Output Price
$2.850 / 1M
Flaky tests
8
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:00 Re-test | 7.0 | 10.0 | $0.607 ↑ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:17 New test added | 7.0 | 10.0 | $0.600 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:43 New test added | 6.8 | 10.0 | $0.328 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:12 Suite changed | 6.7 | 10.0 | $0.314 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-20 17:48 First recorded run | 7.0 | N/A | $0.220 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:00 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 7.0 | 7.0 | 10.0 | 10/22 | 8 | 220,942 | 118,496 | $0.607 | 98.19s |
| 2026-06-04 13:43 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 6.8 | 6.9 | 10.0 | 10/21 | 8 | 206,126 | 34,312 | $0.328 | 98.43s |
| Difference | — | +0.1 | +0.1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | +14816 | +84184 | +$0.279 | -240ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.400 / 1M | $1.900 / 1M |
| 2026-06-17 10:07 | $0.375 / 1M | $2.025 / 1M |
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.571 / 1M | $2.850 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Kimi K2.5mediumvsSeed-2.0-MinimediumKimi K2.5mediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5mediumKimi K2.5mediumvsGrok 4.20mediumKimi K2.5mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashmediumKimi K2.5mediumvsMercury 2mediumKimi K2.5mediumvsSeed-2.0-CodehighKimi K2.5mediumvsGPT-5.5noneKimi K2.5mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashnoneKimi K2.5mediumvsGLM 5.1mediumKimi K2.5mediumvsQwen3.6 Flashmedium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Coding | 6.1 | 4.6 | |
| Combined | 6.7 | 9.1 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 6.5 | 3.4 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.3 | 7.3 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |