#87 MiniMax M2.7
medium- Cost
- $0.022
- Time
- 22.8s
- Tokens
- 9,250 tok
Minimax
Release: 2026-03-18
Tested on: 2026-04-11 01:44
minimax/minimax-m2.7::medium
230B total (10B active)MoEWeights available Summary
MiniMax M2.7 scores 5.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #87. It has N/A reliability, a 51.9% pass rate, $0.091 total cost, and 31.08s average response time.
What makes MiniMax M2.7 unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 230B total (10B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Weights available
- License
- MiniMax modified MIT
5.3
Consistency
5.5
N/A
$0.091
Total Output Tokens
67,771
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.300 / 1M
Output Price
$1.200 / 1M
Cache Read Price
N/A
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
10
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:38 Re-test | 5.0 | 10.0 | $0.208 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 21:18 New test added | 5.0 | 10.0 | $0.196 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:26 New test added | 5.3 | 7.8 | $0.124 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:52 Suite changed | 5.0 | 8.3 | $0.104 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 5.3 | N/A | $0.091 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 01:44 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 5.3 | 5.5 | N/A | 4/18 | 10 | 67,771 | 0 | $0.091 | 31.08s |
| 2026-08-14 01:38 · Re-test | 66/66 attempts | 5.0 | 6.6 | 10.0 | 5/22 | 9 | 147,704 | 114,527 | $0.208 | 43.25s |
| Difference | — | +0.2 | -1.1 | -1 | +1 | -79933 | -114527 | -$0.117 | -12168ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
MiniMax M2.7mediumvsMercury 2.5 PreviewlowMiniMax M2.7mediumvsDots 3 Note PreviewdefaultFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsLaguna S 2.1mediumFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsGPT-4o-minidefaultMiniMax M2.7mediumvsApodex 1.1 MinidefaultFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsKAT Coder AIR V2.5lowMiniMax M2.7mediumvsMiMo-V2.5-PrononeMiniMax M2.7mediumvsInkling SmallnoneFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsKAT Coder AIR V2.5mediumMiniMax M2.7mediumvsQwen3 Coder Nextdefault
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 7.9 | 6.3 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 4.7 | 1.6 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 3.9 | 2.5 | |
| Instructions following | 3.7 | 1.8 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 3.8 | 4.5 | |
| Tool Calling | 4.7 | 1.6 |