#163 MiniMax M2.7
medium- Cost
- $0.022
- Time
- 22.8s
- Tokens
- 9,250 tok
Minimax
Release: 2026-03-18
Tested on: 2026-07-16 21:18
minimax/minimax-m2.7::medium
230B total (10B active)MoEWeights available Summary
MiniMax M2.7 scores 5.0 on AI BENCHY and ranks #163. It has 10.0 reliability, a 45.5% pass rate, $0.196 total cost, and 41.28s average response time.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 230B total (10B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Weights available
- License
- MiniMax modified MIT
5.0
Consistency
6.6
10.0
$0.196
Total Output Tokens
137,594
Total Input Tokens
114,518
Input Price
$0.300 / 1M
Output Price
$1.200 / 1M
Flaky tests
9
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:38 Re-test | 5.0 | 10.0 | $0.208 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 21:18 New test added | 5.0 | 10.0 | $0.196 | Current run | |
| 2026-06-04 13:26 New test added | 5.3 | 7.8 | $0.124 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:52 Suite changed | 5.0 | 8.3 | $0.104 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 5.3 | N/A | $0.091 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-16 21:18 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 5.0 | 6.6 | 10.0 | 5/22 | 9 | 137,594 | 114,518 | $0.196 | 41.28s |
| 2026-05-21 23:52 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 5.0 | 5.9 | 8.3 | 4/20 | 10 | 81,525 | 0 | $0.104 | 29.96s |
| Difference | — | 0.0 | +0.7 | +1.7 | +1 | -1 | +56069 | +114518 | +$0.092 | +11312ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.279 / 1M | $1.200 / 1M |
| 2026-06-10 13:42 | $0.270 / 1M | $1.080 / 1M |
| 2026-06-12 18:42 | $0.250 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M |
| 2026-06-29 01:00 | $0.180 / 1M | $0.720 / 1M |
| 2026-07-09 20:59 | $0.240 / 1M | $0.960 / 1M |
| 2026-07-16 15:36 | $0.300 / 1M | $1.200 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
MiniMax M2.7mediumvsNorth Mini CodenoneFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsMercury 2.5 PreviewlowMiniMax M2.7mediumvsQwen3.5-9BnoneMiniMax M2.7mediumvsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneMiniMax M2.7mediumvsDeepSeek V3.2noneMiniMax M2.7mediumvsMercury 2.5lowMiniMax M2.7mediumvsGPT-4o-mininoneMiniMax M2.7mediumvsQwen3 Coder NextnoneMiniMax M2.7mediumvsMercury 2.5 Previewnone
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 7.9 | 6.3 | |
| Coding | 5.7 | 9.1 | |
| Combined | 3.8 | 1.6 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 3.9 | 2.5 | |
| Instructions following | 3.8 | 5.8 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.9 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 4.7 | 1.6 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |