- Score
- 7.5 (+1.80 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s · 55.2% faster
Summary
Ring 2.6 1t scores 5.7 on AI BENCHY and ranks #309. It has 10.0 reliability, a 56.5% pass rate, $0.102 total cost, and 65.52s average response time.
What makes Ring 2.6 1t unique: It stands out most in Anti-AI Tricks, where it ranks #1, while Agentic is its weakest area at #16.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.6 (+2.84 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 40.7% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 88.5% faster
- Score
- 8.3 (+2.53 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.047 · 54.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 18.07s · 72.4% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 1T total (63B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
5.7
Consistency
8.9
10.0
Total Output Tokens
149,419
Total Input Tokens
113,613
Input Price
$0.075 / 1M
Output Price
$0.625 / 1M
Cache Read Price
N/A
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#309 Ring 2.6 1t
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 02:53 Re-test | 5.7 | 10.0 | $0.102 ↑ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 23:27 New test added | 6.3 | 10.0 | $0.103 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:30 New test added | 6.9 | 10.0 | $0.033 |