#148 Gemma 4 26B A4B
none- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 39.5s
- Tokens
- 790 tok
Google
Release: 2026-04-03
Tested on: 2026-07-16 23:02
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it::none
25.2B total (3.8B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Gemma 4 26B A4B scores 5.5 on AI BENCHY and ranks #148. It has 10.0 reliability, a 42.4% pass rate, $0.018 total cost, and 7.64s average response time.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 25.2B total (3.8B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
5.5
Consistency
9.2
10.0
Total Output Tokens
15,781
Total Input Tokens
131,282
Input Price
$0.100 / 1M
Output Price
$0.300 / 1M
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:51 Re-test | 5.6 | 10.0 | $0.023 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 23:02 New test added | 5.5 | 10.0 | $0.018 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-06-04 14:04 New test added | 6.0 | 10.0 | $0.004 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:29 Suite changed | 6.2 | 10.0 | $0.006 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-22 21:39 First recorded run | 6.2 | N/A | $0.005 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-16 23:02 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 5.5 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 8/22 | 2 | 15,781 | 131,282 | $0.018 | 7.64s |
| 2026-06-04 14:04 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 6.0 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 8/21 | 2 | 1,824 | 40,038 | $0.004 | 5.91s |
| Difference | — | -0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | +13957 | +91244 | +$0.015 | +1728ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.060 / 1M | $0.330 / 1M |
| 2026-07-16 15:36 | $0.100 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Gemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailablevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highGemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailablevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumGemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-122B-A10BnoneGemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailablevsNemotron 3.5 LightninghighFree AvailableGemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailablevsKimi K2.6noneGemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailablevsQwen3.6 27BnoneGemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailablevsGLM 5.1noneGemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailablevsQwen3.8 27BnoneGemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailablevsLing-3.0-flashnoneGemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailablevsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423none
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.3 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 3.7 | 7.2 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.6 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.3 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.2 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |