Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.6. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.023 vs $0.133. Gemma 4 26B A4B is faster at 7.58s vs 19.57s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 30.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#207
Total Output Tokens
15,781
Response Time (avg)
7.58s
Total Cost
$0.023
Rank
#201
Total Output Tokens
30,249
Response Time (avg)
19.57s
Total Cost
$0.133
Recommended model Gemma 4 26B A4B

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.6 vs 5.7), while costing about 6.0x less than Kimi K2.6.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B none Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.6 5.7
Rank #207 #201
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 30.3%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.208 3.732
Total Cost $0.023 $0.133
Input Price $0.120 / 1M $0.542 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $2.281 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 131,257 116,983
Output Tokens 15,781 30,249
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 7.58s 19.57s
Response Time (max) 57.10s 238.89s
Response Time (total) 166.82s 430.58s
Parameters 25.2B total (3.8B active) 1T total (32B active)
Availability Open source Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#207 Gemma 4 26B A4B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
39.5s
Tokens
790 tok

#201 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

none
Cost
$0.020
Time
127.4s
Tokens
4,429 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 4.16s 7,736 476 0
Kimi K2.6 5.5 9.8 33.3% 0 82.57s 5,986 14,754 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair