#65 Gemma 4 26B A4B
none- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 39.5s
- Tokens
- 790 tok
Summary
Gemma 4 26B A4B scores 6.2 on AI BENCHY and ranks #65. It has N/A reliability, a 48.2% pass rate, $0.005 total cost, and 6.59s average response time.
What makes Gemma 4 26B A4B unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
6.2
Consistency
8.7
N/A
$0.005
Total Output Tokens
1,783
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.070 / 1M
Output Price
$0.340 / 1M
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Generation showcase
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 14:04 New test added | 6.0 | 10.0 | $0.004 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:29 Suite changed | 6.2 | 10.0 | $0.006 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-22 21:39 First recorded run | 6.2 | N/A | $0.005 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-22 21:39 · First recorded run | 6.2 | 8.7 | N/A | 7/18 | 3 | 1,783 | 0 | $0.005 | 6.59s |
| 2026-05-22 00:29 · Suite changed | 6.2 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 8/20 | 2 | 1,815 | 0 | $0.006 | 6.00s |
| Difference | 0.0 | -0.5 | -1 | +1 | -32 | 0 | -$0.001 | +591ms |
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.3 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 4.7 | 1.6 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.6 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 4.4 | 6.9 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.7 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |