#24 Gemini 3.5 Flash
low- Cost
- $0.068
- Time
- 39.1s
- Tokens
- 7,588 tok
Summary
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 8.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #24. It has 10.0 reliability, a 84.9% pass rate, $0.449 total cost, and 5.76s average response time.
What makes Gemini 3.5 Flash unique: It stands out most in Trivia, where it ranks #1, while Combined is its weakest area at #15. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Researched on 2026-08-12
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Google does not disclose parameter counts.
8.8
Consistency
9.3
10.0
$0.449
Total Output Tokens
35,195
Total Input Tokens
87,826
Input Price
$1.500 / 1M
Output Price
$9.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:46 Re-test | 8.8 | 10.0 | $0.449 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:57 New test added | 8.9 | 10.0 | $0.433 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:02 New test added | 9.4 | 10.0 | $0.349 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:28 Suite changed | 9.3 | 10.0 | $0.285 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-19 23:35 Initial run | 9.6 | 10.0 | $0.245 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:46 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 8.8 | 9.3 | 10.0 | 18/22 | 2 | 35,195 | 87,826 | $0.449 | 5.76s |
| 2026-06-04 14:02 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 9.4 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 19/21 | 0 | 32,552 | 36,938 | $0.349 | 3.27s |
| Difference | — | -0.5 | -0.7 | 0.0 | -1 | +2 | +2643 | +50888 | +$0.101 | +2491ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $1.500 / 1M | $9.000 / 1M |
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 7.8 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 8.2 | 6.9 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 9.9 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 10.0 | 10.0 |