- Score
- 8.6 (+2.26 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 91.6% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 60.5% faster
Google
Release: 2026-05-08
Tested on: 2026-10-01 02:17
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite::low
~150B total (~10B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Summary
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores 6.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #266. It has 10.0 reliability, a 60.9% pass rate, $0.717 total cost, and 19.02s average response time.
What makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #1, while Combined is its weakest area at #14.
Identity note
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview was the preview version of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.3 (+1.95 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.047 · 93.5% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 18.07s · 5.0% faster
- Score
- 9.4 (+3.05 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 74.6% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 67.2% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~150B total (~10B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Google does not disclose parameter counts.
6.3
Consistency
9.3
10.0
$0.717
Total Output Tokens
425,576
Total Input Tokens
312,368
Input Price
$0.250 / 1M
Output Price
$1.500 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.025 / 1M
Cache Write Price
$0.084 / 1M
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#266 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
low- Cost
- $0.003
- Time
- 4.0s
- Tokens
- 1,479 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 02:17 Re-test | 6.3 | 10.0 | $0.717 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 23:07 New test added | 6.5 | 10.0 | $0.621 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:00 New test added | 7.2 | 10.0 | $0.028 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:26 Suite changed | 7.4 | 10.0 | $0.026 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-08 12:01 Initial run | 7.9 | 10.0 | $0.024 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 02:17 · Current run | 69/69 attempts | 6.3 | 9.3 | 10.0 | 13/23 | 2 | 425,576 | 312,368 | $0.717 | 19.02s |
| 2026-05-22 00:26 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 7.4 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 12/20 | 2 | 11,677 | 0 | $0.026 | 1.92s |
| Difference | — | -1.1 | +0.1 | 0.0 | +1 | 0 | +413899 | +312368 | +$0.691 | +17094ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 69/69 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.250 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $0.250 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M | $0.025 / 1M | $0.084 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Gemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsMinimax M3.1 FlashmediumFree AvailableGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsSolar Pro 4highGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsLing 3.1 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsDeepSeek V3.2medium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 5.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 7.3 | 6.2 | |
| Coding | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.2 | 9.1 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |