#176 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
low- Cost
- $0.003
- Time
- 4.0s
- Tokens
- 1,479 tok
Google
Release: 2026-05-08
Tested on: 2026-08-14 02:43
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite::low
~150B total (~10B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Summary
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores 6.6 on AI BENCHY and ranks #176. It has 10.0 reliability, a 63.6% pass rate, $0.621 total cost, and 16.25s average response time.
Identity note
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview was the preview version of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~150B total (~10B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Google does not disclose parameter counts.
6.6
Consistency
9.2
10.0
$0.621
Total Output Tokens
397,891
Total Input Tokens
94,233
Input Price
$0.250 / 1M
Output Price
$1.500 / 1M
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:43 Re-test | 6.6 | 10.0 | $0.621 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 23:07 New test added | 6.5 | 10.0 | $0.621 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:00 New test added | 7.2 | 10.0 | $0.028 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:26 Suite changed | 7.4 | 10.0 | $0.026 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-08 12:01 Initial run | 7.9 | 10.0 | $0.024 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:43 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 6.6 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 13/22 | 2 | 397,891 | 94,233 | $0.621 | 16.25s |
| 2026-05-08 12:01 · Initial run | 54/54 attempts | 7.9 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 12/18 | 2 | 10,869 | 0 | $0.024 | 1.95s |
| Difference | — | -1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +1 | 0 | +387022 | +94233 | +$0.597 | +14299ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.250 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Gemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsInkling SmallmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsMercury 2.5 PreviewhighGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.5-27BnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.6 27BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsLongCat 2.0highGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsLaguna XS 2.1mediumFree Available
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 7.3 | 6.2 | |
| Coding | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.2 | 9.1 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |