#88 DeepSeek V4 Pro
high- Cost
- $0.023
- Time
- 257.6s
- Tokens
- 14,870 tok
DeepSeek
Release: 2026-04-24
Tested on: 2026-08-14 03:17
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro::high
1.6T total (49B active)MoEOpen source
(high)
(none)
Summary
DeepSeek V4 Pro scores 7.7 on AI BENCHY and ranks #88. It has 10.0 reliability, a 63.6% pass rate, $0.476 total cost, and 92.50s average response time.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 1.6T total (49B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
The V4 family card documents the Pro configuration.
7.7
Consistency
7.7
10.0
Total Output Tokens
209,444
Total Input Tokens
90,757
Input Price
$1.002 / 1M
Output Price
$2.004 / 1M
Flaky tests
6
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 03:17 Re-test | 7.7 | 10.0 | $0.476 ↑ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 23:19 New test added | 7.7 | 10.0 | $0.200 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-16 15:31 Re-test | 7.6 | 9.3 | $0.157 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-16 14:47 Suite changed | 8.1 | 9.6 | $0.098 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:38 New test added | 6.0 | 8.9 | $0.079 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:54 Suite changed | 6.6 | 9.0 | $0.212 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-29 14:47 Re-test | 7.5 | 9.3 | $0.209 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-26 10:50 Re-test | 7.5 | 8.4 | $0.201 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-25 21:53 Initial run | 8.2 | N/A | $0.329 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 03:17 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 7.7 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 10/22 | 6 | 209,444 | 90,757 | $0.476 | 92.50s |
| 2026-06-04 14:38 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 6.0 | 7.3 | 8.9 | 8/21 | 7 | 84,507 | 32,240 | $0.079 | 65.21s |
| Difference | — | +1.6 | +0.4 | +1.1 | +2 | -1 | +124937 | +58517 | +$0.398 | +27291ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-16 14:59 | $0.435 / 1M | $0.870 / 1M |
| 2026-08-11 09:41 | $0.632 / 1M | $1.264 / 1M |
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $1.169 / 1M | $2.337 / 1M |
| 2026-09-04 19:19 | $1.002 / 1M | $2.004 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
DeepSeek V4 ProhighvsClaude Opus 4.6mediumDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423highDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsSeed-2.0-CodelowDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsGPT-5.6 LunahighDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsGLM 5mediumDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsSolar Pro 4xhighDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsQwen3.7 FlashhighDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsNemotron 3 UltramediumFree AvailableDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsClaude Opus 4.8lowDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsClaude Opus 5none
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 5.7 | 5.9 | |
| Coding | 6.3 | 8.7 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.6 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 7.8 | 6.6 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.9 | 4.9 | |
| Tool Calling | 9.8 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |