#124 Seed-2.0-Mini
medium- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 161.7s
- Tokens
- 4,379 tok
Bytedance Seed
Release: 2026-02-14
Tested on: 2026-08-14 03:01
bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-mini::medium
~50B total (~5B active)MoEClosedEstimated Summary
Seed-2.0-Mini scores 7.0 on AI BENCHY and ranks #124. It has 8.7 reliability, a 57.6% pass rate, $0.116 total cost, and 93.10s average response time.
What makes Seed-2.0-Mini unique: It stands out most in Puzzle Solving, where it ranks #3, while Anti-AI Tricks is its weakest area at #17.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~50B total (~5B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Seed2 tiers are public, but their parameter counts are not.
7.0
Consistency
8.9
8.7
$0.116
Total Output Tokens
258,322
Total Input Tokens
125,704
Input Price
$0.100 / 1M
Output Price
$0.400 / 1M
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 03:01 Re-test | 7.0 | 8.7 | $0.116 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 23:23 New test added | 7.0 | 8.5 | $0.101 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:36 New test added | 6.9 | 6.7 | $0.044 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:44 Suite changed | 7.1 | 5.0 | $0.044 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 7.5 | N/A | $0.037 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 03:01 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 7.0 | 8.9 | 8.7 | 11/22 | 3 | 258,322 | 125,704 | $0.116 | 93.10s |
| 2026-05-22 00:44 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 7.1 | 9.2 | 5.0 | 11/20 | 2 | 97,852 | 0 | $0.044 | 79.17s |
| Difference | — | -0.1 | -0.3 | +3.7 | 0 | +1 | +160470 | +125704 | +$0.073 | +13930ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.100 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Seed-2.0-MinimediumvsGrok 4.20mediumSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsKimi K2.5mediumSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsMercury 2mediumSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5mediumSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsGPT-5.5noneSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsQwen3.7 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsGLM 5.1mediumSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsSeed-2.0-CodehighSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsDeepSeek V3.2mediumSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsGemini 3.5 Flashnone
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 6.6 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 5.5 | 9.8 | |
| Combined | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.1 | 3.4 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 8.2 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |