Navigate
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Mini (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium)

Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) leads on average score with 7.6 vs 7.5. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.047 vs $0.140. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) is faster at 24.79s vs 91.67s, with pass rates of 59.4% vs 75.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#124
Total Output Tokens
271,559
Response Time (avg)
91.67s
Total Cost
$0.140
Rank
#119
Total Output Tokens
143,965
Response Time (avg)
24.79s
Total Cost
~$0.047
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium)

It has the best score here (7.6), while costing about 3.0x less than Seed-2.0-Mini (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Mini Seed-2.0-Mini medium Release: 2026-02-14 Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next medium Release: 2026-10-04
Score 7.5 7.6
Rank #124 #119
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 9.0 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.4% 75.4%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.167 ~0.314
Total Cost $0.140 ~$0.047
Input Price $0.100 / 1M N/A
Output Price $0.400 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 313,368 278,792
Output Tokens 12,289 1,695
Reasoning Tokens 259,270 142,270
Response Time (avg) 91.67s 24.79s
Response Time (max) 301.78s 159.62s
Response Time (total) 1833.43s 570.26s
Parameters ~50B total (~5B active) 180B total (6B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#124 Seed-2.0-Mini

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
161.7s
Tokens
4,379 tok

#119 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
40.7s
Tokens
4,059 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Mini 5.5 9.8 33.3% 0 220.48s 3,823 464 34,964
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 45.53s 7,893 346 37,643

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

GPT-6 LunalowvsQwen3.8 Flash NextmediumQwen3.8 Flash NextmediumvsSpace Bunny AlphahighSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsSpace Bunny AlphahighSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailableSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsGPT-6 LunalowSeed-2.0-CodehighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextmediumSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsGrok 4.7lowSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsInkling SmallhighFree AvailableMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextmediumGPT-6 LunahighvsQwen3.8 Flash Nextmedium