#32 Seed-2.0-Lite
medium- Cost
- $0.005
- Time
- 86.7s
- Tokens
- 2,354 tok
Bytedance Seed
Release: 2026-02-14
Tested on: 2026-07-16 23:12
bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-lite::medium
~200B total (~20B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Seed-2.0-Lite scores 7.9 on AI BENCHY and ranks #32. It has 10.0 reliability, a 74.2% pass rate, $0.234 total cost, and 48.53s average response time.
What makes Seed-2.0-Lite unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #2, while Combined is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~200B total (~20B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Seed2 tiers are public, but their parameter counts are not.
7.9
Consistency
8.6
10.0
$0.234
Total Output Tokens
100,580
Total Input Tokens
129,897
Input Price
$0.250 / 1M
Output Price
$2.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
4
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:58 Re-test | 7.8 | 10.0 | $0.236 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 23:12 New test added | 7.9 | 10.0 | $0.234 | Current run | |
| 2026-06-04 14:30 New test added | 8.2 | 10.0 | $0.175 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:37 Re-test | 8.1 | 10.0 | $0.153 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 8.6 | N/A | $0.121 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-16 23:12 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 7.9 | 8.6 | 10.0 | 14/22 | 4 | 100,580 | 129,897 | $0.234 | 48.53s |
| 2026-06-04 14:30 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 8.2 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 14/21 | 3 | 81,636 | 46,740 | $0.175 | 47.07s |
| Difference | — | -0.3 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 0 | +1 | +18944 | +83157 | +$0.059 | +1468ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.250 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Seed-2.0-LitemediumvsQwen3.8 27BmediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsClaude Opus 4.8lowSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsGPT-5.6 TerramediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsGLM 5mediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsGLM 5.2mediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsSeed-2.0-CodelowSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsClaude Opus 4.6medium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.3 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 8.0 | 9.8 | |
| Combined | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.9 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 6.7 | 3.6 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 9.0 | 7.9 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |