Navigate
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

GLM 5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.224 vs $0.236. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 47.94s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#89
Total Output Tokens
101,296
Response Time (avg)
47.94s
Total Cost
$0.236
Rank
#85
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.224
Recommended model GLM 5.2 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 2.1x faster than Seed-2.0-Lite (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite medium Release: 2026-02-14 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #89 #85
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 8.6 8.0
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.809 2.159
Total Cost $0.236 $0.224
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 129,906 37,199
Output Tokens 12,530 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 88,766 49,500
Response Time (avg) 47.94s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 254.92s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 1054.57s 488.94s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#89 Seed-2.0-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
86.7s
Tokens
2,354 tok

#85 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 8.0 9.8 66.7% 0 156.74s 8,247 458 31,890
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair