Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.184 vs $0.234. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 48.53s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2 (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 2.1x faster than Seed-2.0-Lite (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite medium Release: 2026-02-14 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.9 7.8
Rank #42 #45
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 8.6 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 80.3%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.669 2.159
Total Cost $0.234 $0.184
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.793 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $2.491 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 129,897 37,199
Output Tokens 12,533 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 88,047 49,500
Response Time (avg) 48.53s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 254.92s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 1067.74s 488.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#42 Seed-2.0-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
86.7s
Tokens
2,354 tok

#45 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 8.0 9.8 66.7% 0 156.74s 8,247 458 31,890
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair